Mr. Deity and the Bang! - Season 4 Finale

And here it is, guys, the episode you've all been waiting for. Probably. Just humor me.

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4clYlJVzoqs&feature=colike

Glorious, isn't it? I think it's a pretty epic sendoff to season 4. Keep in mind, this was the prequel season. So that's essentially meant to lead into season 1, and season 5 will pick back up where season 3's cliffhanger left off. Confused? You should be.

Simple Thoughts: Holding the door

I get a small kick over the awkward confused shuffle that occurs as people are entering or exiting a building, stumbling to hold the door for the next person, or the person going the opposite direction. Sometimes this results in holding the doors in the most uncomfortable ways, or with extreme feats of strength, or in ways that aren't actually at all helpful, just to maintain the social courtesy of holding the door for others. It makes me smile to see people putting this much effort into simply trying to be polite to a stranger. Makes you wonder what it would be like if the same people were proportionately as willing to make awkward strides to help strangers with bigger problems.

Walking a fine line with Apple fans this week

The tech world is in mourning this week, and that's fine. We (and I do mean we, despite what's coming) lost a great, visionary leader in our world who had a major, profound impact on the shape of technology. No, he wasn't much of a designer himself, and he wasn't the messiah he was made out to be, but his drive was very, very much responsible for pushing the industry in some major directions.

The iPhone alone has been profoundly impactful on my life, even though I've never owned one. Although Android was in development well before its release, and other smartphones existed, and ALL of the technology that was put into the iPhone existed before it (plus plenty that didn't hit it for months or years after), Apple managed to make it visible, usable, and accessible to the consumers. They also had the balls to use hardware that drove the cost of the phone up to 2-3 times what people expected to pay for a phone, knowing their hardcore fanbase would buy it, and allowing them to bring the cost of these parts down for the rest of the tech community. The need and the availability made the other smartphones that many of us prefer a feasible option.

Out of respect this week I've tried to hold my tongue in places I normally don't. I try to avoid the Mac vs Windows (Macs are PCs, which even Steve referred to them as before their marketing decided to try to brand them as some other class) debate as much as possible, and more importantly I try very, very hard to avoid expressing a biased, fanboyish angle on it. I try to be fair, and I cede a ton of points in Apple's favor despite my personal conclusions. But this week I've tried to avoid even that out of respect.

But the hyperbole the fanboys are spouting right now has reached a level that I just have to speak up on one thing that's the most common issue I deal with here, and the most ridiculous one of all. And it comes down simply to this:

Windows users are not merely unenlightened.

[[MORE]]

See, I find consistently that the Apple-fanatical seems to believe that the only reason I, or anyone else still uses Windows is merely because we haven't TRIED a Mac, and if we did we'd instantly see just how infinitely better it is. This attitude even spreads out to non-savvy users of Windows who assume that they, also, would probably make the switch the moment they can try it and see how amazing it is, assuming they can afford it. When I work on their computers, I constantly get asked, "so you of course own a Mac at home, right?" because as what they view as a computer expert, I would obviously use only the best for myself. They seem shocked that I run exclusively Windows computers despite my advanced (from their angle) knowledge.

But here's the reality: I'm not unenlightened. In my company I'm one of the few users with plenty of hands-on experience with Macs, having working full-time in Mac-only offices, having had loaner MacBooks for projects, and being the most-dispatched person for clients with Mac issues. But this is due not to some deep-seated love for Macs, it's due to my love of technology, and ability to quickly pick up new tech skills on the fly. And so when I've gotten real, hands-on time with Macs, I've gotten to understand the interface, and dig through help files and online tips and forums and figure out the workarounds for the things I don't like or don't understand or that work differently, and I can grow comfortable enough with them to work efficiently.

But despite all that familiarity, when I return home at the end of the day, I sit down in front of my self-built Windows 7 PC with a sense of relief. I get to sit in front of a computer that works the way I do. That doesn't fight me, or try to get me to conform to doing everything the one, official, ordained way, but lets me do it MY way. A computer that has all the buttons I want that Mac users can't seem to figure out why I would use, yet let me work at a pace I rarely see them achieve. The one that I'm comfortable with, and that works PERFECTLY and RELIABLY.

Yes, that's right, my Windows 7 computers "just work." I know the less-informed Mac users may be surprised by that notion, assuming that those two words were trademarked by Apple because they only apply to Apple, but the reality is they apply beautifully to Windows 7, and especially to users who know how to use their computers. Now I know many people may then argue that obviously it requires someone tech-savvy to do it, while Macs don't. That's not necessarily true on either count. I see Windows 7 run this smoothly for many of my more clueless clients, and I watch Mac users run their computers as badly into the ground as I see some Windows machines. Clueless users can kill the best system, and skilled users can make any OS sing.

Now I know another thing you (unspecified Mac lover who's reading this) are thinking right now: Yeah, but I don't get viruses! To which I respond: Yeah, I don't get viruses, either. What's your point? The truth is I've had one. In the two decades or so I've been running Windows I've had ONE virus. And it was my own stupid fault for running something I had good reason to be suspicious of. And I was able to wipe it out. Outside of that, I often run my systems completely without antivirus software for months at a time, but I still get nothing on my system, because I know what I'm doing. Meanwhile Macs of course aren't immune, and just as I've predicted for quite some time, infections are on the rise. Will they ever be as bad as they were on Windows? Probably not. But viruses on Windows aren't as bad as they were before on Windows, either. And 8's going to make them even rarer.

My point here, after all the rambling, isn't to try to claim the superiority of Windows. I don't think it's superior at all. I just think it's fantastic, and exactly the operating system I want to run, despite having plenty of experience with both OS X and variations of Linux. It works the way I want to, supports the widest range of software, and really does just work. But that only makes it better than OS X for me as well as many, many other people. OS X is a beautiful, well-designed OS that is also better, for others. I don't and won't begrudge them that, and I respect it. All I ask is that they remember that operating systems aren't religions. There's no right or wrong in them. There's only personal preference.

A question I didn't get to answer on Ardent Atheist

On last night's Ardent Atheist live stream and podcast, Emery passed to me to follow up a topic Heather was discussing, on just how to handle the believers who won't stop arguing, won't stop yelling (in written form), and won't listen to reason. The question, simply enough, is about when to stop. Should you stop? When do we decide they're a lost cause?

For me, it's not a question of the believer being a lost cause or not. In fact, that's not even relevant to me. When I'm debating someone who's coming across possibly as stupid, foolish, willfully ignorant, or exceptionally dense, I'm not debating to change their minds. I don't deny the possibility that I could, as I have friends who were once quite committed believers, but at a certain point I stop expecting to make a difference to them. So why do I keep it up?

For one simple reason: the Internet is public, and close to eternal. The arguments you post online are visible to essentially anyone, and can have a major impact. A person who's sitting on the fence, or even someone who thinks they're set in their belief can stumble across your debate and quite possibly see something fresh and new to them. They can find the attitude you project, and your willingness to actually speak openly and honestly about your opinions, and gain perspective from it that they wouldn't otherwise have. Creationists have been de-converted by people willing to actually bother to keep up the debates against all odds.

There are plenty of good reasons to give up on an endless, failing argument. Exhaustion, frustration, sanity, and lack of time are all solid ones, and it seems fair to state them and move on. But the mere fact that the person you're arguing with is beyond the ability to change their mind is, in my opinion, not good enough. They're not the ones most likely to learn from your efforts, and if you're willing to keep it up, it's worth it.

Minor updates

I just did the excellent Ardent Atheist podcast tonight. Since there'll be a link back from there to my site, I thought it was time to make some quick changes/improvements to the site, one of which was a simple cleanup of the theme. The old one was slow to load and overstyled. This one I picked in a hurry, but it's clean and easy to customize and will probably change over time. It's still an improvement, though. I hope you appreciate the amount of effort I go through for you at 2AM on a work night.

Way of the Mister, Vol 1: Reparative Therapy

You're all familiar with Mr. Deity, yes? No? Fix that. I'll wait.

Done? Cool. As you no doubt know by now, having just watched every single episode of the show, minus the ones Sony has tied up and hidden, I've done a bunch of episodes of it now and have become inextricably entwined in its beauty, and I'm very proud of what we've achieved with it and continue to achieve.

But today I reveal to you the first episode of our new project, and something that, to me, feels even bigger, more important, and more impactful. I give you the first video of Way of the Mister:

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zqv-y5Ys3fg

Brilliant, right? Everything was spot-on. Brian's writing was killer (and Carrie and I had our hands in a few of the lines that I think really killed), his editing was superb as always, cinematography fantastic, and I genuinely think the ENTIRE cast was in top form, including Michael Shermer as, well, himself. Please, do us a favor and spread this video far and wide. The clear, satirical message in this one is vital in educating people on the absurd concept that homosexuality can be "cured." This has the potential to be more far-reaching than Mr. Deity, and it needs to get attention. Let's make a difference. Let's be careful out there!

Tablets are nothing like game consoles

Today I saw a status on Facebook that caught my eye. A friend commented in reference to the failing of WebOS that it was time tablet manufacturers learned to go with the game console model of selling their hardware at a loss. I thought about this, and realized the flaw. Here's my reply, copied-and-pasted:

Those two models can't be compared for a variety of reasons:

In game consoles the manufacturer designs high-end hardware that's beyond what's feasible to sell at the price the market will bear. They take anywhere from a $100-200 loss at launch (unless you're Nintendo, in which case you take no losses). Licensing fees, per game sold, are somewhere around $5-10 per game, so the manufacturer on games sold alone makes back that loss in 10-40 games sold per launch-priced console over its lifetime, plus profit on extra controllers and other accessories which are a higher profit margin. Meanwhile they don't continue to take that same loss. Over the course of the first year the volume sold, die shrinks, and manufacturing improvements shave a good half of the loss off the cost of the unit, and typically there are no price drops. Price drops tend not to come until year two, when there've been even bigger die shrinks, various chips have been combined, and other components have been shrunk and cheapened. The first price drop typically correlates with the manufacturer being able to finally stop taking a loss on the hardware, now breaking even. The costs continue to decrease, and usually by year three or so they begin to make a small profit on the hardware while continuing to drop its price. By the end of its life they're making a profit on every unit sold, continuing to sell games with those licensing fees, continuing to sell accessories that haven't dropped in price at all, and have successfully recouped the lost profits on the launch systems while having more quickly recouped said costs as time went buy with each later system sold. This entire process is allowed for by one simple principle: the specs and capabilities of the system never change over those 5-10 years. Maybe pack-in hard drive increases in size, or hardware gets smaller, but the expensive design and specs never change.

In tablets, first off, unless you're in a closed OS like iOS or WebOS, you're not making ANY money off of software sold for it, and the vast majority of accessories are not licensed or made by you, and the vast majority of users don't want them anyway. But assuming you're on one of the closed OSes, there are two very notable differences: One is the price and profit of apps. Most of the apps are free, and most users stick as closely to the free apps as humanly possible. Of the apps that aren't free, most are $.99-$1.99. Assuming a common figure, the cut of the app store is as much as 70 percent of that, so basically $.69-$1.39. Pretending they subsidized by the above-mentioned $100-200, that would be anywhere from 72 to 290 apps sold before they broke even on their initial loss. And unlike game consoles, they don't get the luxury of continually lowered costs, eventually selling their hardware at a profit. Because they're expected to release a new, better, faster, smarter, cooler, slimmer, higher-resolution model every six months to a year. So by the time their costs could begin to reduce, they're forced to re-up with new hardware that costs about the same and the process begins again. And of course for Android and Windows Phone 7 it's even hardware because the manufacturers have no cut in the app store, so their ONLY profit comes from the hardware, itself.

I've personally bought no more than ten apps since I switched to Android two years ago, and I'm on my second Android phone. Pretending either manufacturer could make a profit, they would have lost a ton of money on me with that model. I know we're talking about tablets and not phones, but the model's the same and the store is the same. Over the year or two I'd own a tablet before upgrading it--and pretending I'd even consider a closed OS--the odds of the manufacturer making even $50 from me is slim to none, and I doubt I'm anywhere near alone in that. It just makes no sense.

One place we may see this carry out differently: Amazon's upcoming tablets. Rumors are they're going to subsidize, and for them there's more logic to this. Odds are they'll customize the hell out of the Android OS to make their own Appstore the only one built in, and the easiest-to-use default. So they'll have all the app sales, definitely. But Amazon also has arguably the best music store available, so they'll also gain all the profits from people more easily buying music through them. And finally they have Kindle, which has already eclipsed all hardcopy book sales on their site. They'll have a ton of new Kindle owners with their tablet buying books directly from their store. But it's only by combining these THREE exclusive revenue streams that they could likely have any real hope of recouping their losses on the hardware. And even so, I doubt the discounts will be as huge as people are claiming. But time will tell.

Any thoughts? Flaws in my logic, or models I'm not thinking of in which a tablet, whether closed or open OS, could manage to earn its manufacturer money while sold at a profit?

I’m Officially Done with Smartphone Hardware Keyboards

My first smartphone was the HTC Mogul for Sprint. Before that I had a long line of dumbphones (AKA "feature phones") of various sorts. I had begun to really get into text messaging as a primary form of communication, and although I was pretty damn quick with T9 (like riding a bicycle I can easily pick it back up now), I longed for a REAL keyboard to pick up speed with. So when I went to a smartphone it was a no-brainer to get one with a keyboard, partially because I wanted one so badly, and partially because there really weren't any smartphones at the time without them (the HTC Touch came a few months later).

I picked it up quickly, and immediately found the benefits. As a touch-typist I learned the layout and began writing at a pretty darn high speed, autocorrecting my errors like I do with my computer's keyboard, and quickly reaching the point where I no longer needed to look at the screen. My suspicions were confirmed, and it became a must-have feature.

Soon after the iPhone was unveiled, and I was floored by it, at least for most of its unveiling. The lack of expandable storage, replaceable battery, availability on anyone but Cingular, and hardware keyboard sunk it for me. I knew I could never type as quickly, accurately, or without looking on an on-screen keyboard and its lack of tactile feedback, and I moved on and stuck with keyboard models ever since.

But prior to my current device I had seen the pattern phones were taking. The coolest, slickest, best-specced phones didn't have keyboards, and I knew I was going to have to make a change and get used to it. I played with the Moment's on-screen options and determined that even if they slowed me down a bit, I could get used to it. Plus Swype was actually pretty cool for one-handed writing. I had also determined that I was going to get an EVO 4G if Sprint didn't get a variant of the Samsung Galaxy S. And then all my desires were answered in the form of the Epic 4G which was both a Galaxy S AND had a keyboard.

It didn't take long for me to run into a serious problem with the Epic, though: the keyboard sucks. Physically, it's fine. The keys feel good, and they've got a nice give to them, and the spacing's good. I was able to get my speed up to usual pretty quickly and I would have been fine with it, except it randomly SKIPS inputs. You can type a whole paragraph and go back and notice that a third of your words are randomly missing letters that you DEFINITELY typed. I know myself, I know my autocorrection, and I typed those letters. But they're simply not there. So not cool.

I put up with this for a while, and finally I decided to see if I could do better. So I installed the freshly-ripped Gingerbread keyboard on my phone and told myself to spend a couple of days without the hardware keyboard. And in the last few months my keyboard's been used for nothing but checking whether my phone's frozen.

Turns out onscreen typing's not only not as bad as I thought, but faster. For one thing the built-in autocorrection works better than I expected and is certainly an improvement over the random missed letters. Common little errors are corrected as you go, and while sometimes its recommendations are laughable, most of the time it's pretty helpful. I also quickly found that, to a degree, I still didn't need to look at the screen. Even with the lack of the physical feel of the keys, I knew their positions well enough to make do pretty darn well. All in all, I adjusted much faster than I expected and with the exception of entering odd strings of text or URLs I didn't mind it the way I expected. Punctuation's a bitch in many cases, but I struggle through it.

But things came to a head today when I upgraded to the latest Bonsai4All ROM for my phone, which includes a FIX for the damn keyboard problem. Finally. So I figured it was time to try it out and see if I can go back to my beloved hardware keyboard and switch the onscreen back to Swype for easy one-handed use. Boy was I surprised to find that, despite the hardware keyboard being noticeably more accurate (although still not perfect), my typing speed was DRASTICALLY slower than I had gotten used to. It had nothing to do with lost familiarity (my fingers were finding the keys just fine) and everything to do with the spread-out spacing and the physical effort in pressing the keys. Silly things I never considered an issue before, but the subtle loss of time in traveling distance and depressing buttons adds up quickly when you're hitting a large number of keys in a short period of time with only two thumbs available.

And that's that for me. The allegiance I held to hardware keyboards on phones has ended with that final realization. Unless Sprint's next awesome phone has a keyboard and no comparable alternative without, I will now have officially switched to onscreen keyboards from now on, gaining me access to much slimmer phone (even if I wish they'd stop making the damn things slimmer and start putting in bigger batteries).

But good luck prying my hardware QWERTY desktop keyboard out of my cold, dead hands"¦ ;)

Bo knows Charlie Sheen

It's no secret I'm a huge fan of Bo Burnham, and I just finally got around to buying his latest album Words Words Words online. I played it three times on my commutes to and from various clients today and a few specific songs stood out, some of which are on YouTube. Since it's been a while since I've done a proper Bo-fest on here, I thought I'd go ahead and link to a few.

The first one actually got the attention of the woman in the car next to me on Ventura Blvd. I noticed her looking at my car and gesturing, so I paused, rolled the window down the rest of the way, and she told me how funny what I was listening to was, allowing me the opportunity to pimp Bo Burnham to a complete stranger. It's also strangely timely thanks to the Charlie Sheen situation (to which Bo just Tweeted this). I saw it online a month or so ago and felt it confirmed that Bo's not just a guy who can write funny, random, shocking material, but is truly insightful. Enjoy:

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eo9pU1q8sy8

More after the break...

[[MORE]]The next one plays a bit on Bo's roots, so head back to my first post on him for a refresher of his style. Sound quality is, IMO, not as good as I'd like, and the album version's much better (especially the live one, which helps you pick out some of the smarter lyrics better), but it's a fun video nonetheless.

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iuF6CpML3IQ

And finally, what I think is some of his finest work yet. There's not much more I can say to do this video justice. The song is great, and the quality of the production is fantastic, and the video really adds to the song's humor instead of distracting like some do.

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dcLFmN7aJe0

Anyway, just felt like sharing some great new works of a long-running favorite of mine. If you enjoy his work, check out his website, Amazon page, YouTube channel and Twitter feed for more.

YouTube Remote - An example of the future

No question one of the best parts of Android is its extensive app marketplace. On top of that, if you're a fan of Google's various services the integration it offers with them is extensive. From having your contacts available within seconds of first setting up your phone to having Google Maps remember your recent search history from your desktop, the connections are great. One place this ties in especially well is with YouTube.

Now of course Android ships with a solid YouTube app for viewing YouTube videos on your phone. It works beautifully, makes searching, accessing favorites, playlists, etc. easy, and it has a slick interface. But a few months back Google released an app called YouTube Remote that takes a different tact. Initially it appears quite similar in setup and layout, except it doesn't actually play any videos—at least not on the phone. Instead you browse to YouTube.com/Leanback on your computer (preferably a HTPC) and make sure you're logged in, then log into YouTube Remote with the same account. Suddenly you have Play/Pause/Skip Back/Skip Forward/Next/Previous buttons on your phone that control the video on the screen, you have access to your favorites, playlists, searches, and a queue so you can manage your entire experience from your phone.

Besides the portrait list view, if you tilt the phone to landscape you get full-screen controls overlaid on top of the video's still and access to the Thumbs rating buttons and the ability to do most of the other things you'd want to do with a YouTube video besides simply watch it.

In my home a common activity when friends come over is for someone to remember this cool video they saw on YouTube and put it up on the TV. While that's happening I'll often think of another video we need to watch afterward, or someone else will shout out one we need to watch. With YouTube Remote, instead of having to remember these and search for them when the video's over I can just search for them right on my phone, click the + button and add them to the queue so as soon as the current video's over the next one starts. I can also reorder the search results or other lists, so if I'm on a Tim Minchin kick, or want to play some of Bo Burnham's greatest hits I can just search for them, hit play, and then start reordering the search results without ever messing with my queue.

To me this represents a prime example of the future we're living in. I'm using the slick, intuitive, touchscreen interface of my phone to control YouTube directly and have it push its contents to the computer on my TV. It's so simple, it's so easy, it's so effortless, and I think it's easily overlooked by most people as being exceptionally cool and sophisticated. Heck, I'm pretty sure few people have any awareness of this app, which is a shame.

What are the catches? Well, I think it's arguably not that handy if you're not on an HTPC, as directly using a keyboard and mouse are still easier options, minus the ability to add to the queue without interrupting the current video. Also if you get a text message or an email and go check it and the app manages to unload itself from memory, when you go back in it will completely overtake the current play session on the computer and start over with whatever video is at the top of the list it loads. I hope this gets fixed in a future version, as it's about the only aspect of the setup that's limited.

I hope to see better collaboration between devices of this type. There's a lot of great syncing in place already, such as with Chrome automatically transferring EVERYTHING immediately upon logging in in a new location (including the Cr-48 netbook I was surprised with earlier this month), and there are great streaming options like Windows 7's ability to stream my home music and video library to my notebook via Windows Media Player, or even using Remote Desktop to connect to my home computer from anywhere (including my phone). But it's this type of instant communication between devices that genuinely enriches the experience and isn't merely showing off that I'm excited about. I can't wait to see more of it.

You can get YouTube Remote from the Android Market.

I may be about to hate Charlie Sheen

I actually watch Two and a Half Men. I don't care what others say, I do find it funny. Not brilliant, not hilarious, not deep, and not one of the all-time greats, and years from now I'll probably only remember it as "that show that Charlie Sheen fucked up," but I laugh just enough to keep up with it.

But I will be extremely pissed off if he gets the show canceled right now. Why? Because Monday night's CBS line-up relies on it. And you know what else is in Monday night's CBS line-up? How I Met Your Mother. This show's chances of renewal each season have ranged from solid to being on the bubble each year, and it's likely only the solid line-up that keeps it safe. CBS already moved The Big Bang Theory to Thursdays to spread the wealth, so it's no longer got that as a safety. If Charlie Sheen manages to take down HIMYM, which is possibly the best three-camera on television today and WILL be remembered by me as one of the all-time greatest, I will upgrade him from laughable screw-up who still manages to be funny to pits of hell hatred. You have been warned, Charlie. Tread carefully.

Why I hate Android

Okay, first things first: that headline was pure sensationalism at its core. I love Android, and there are currently no alternatives to it that I would consider as reasonable replacements for everything Android does so damn well. But it's very often the little things that can really frustrate you when dealing with a device or platform.

Case in point, Android's handling of its multimedia duties. See, when Apple decided to get into the smartphone biz, they completely changed the paradigm of what we expected. Instead of a phone built around business needs that could also browse the web and play audio files, they started with an iPod and built around that. In fact that's what led to many of the early jokes about the iPhone really just being an iPod that made phone calls. It was initially best at its roots and poor at everything else. It's since improved drastically, although the joke that it's terrible at making phone calls remains.

Meanwhile Android came from a more base concept of trying to do everything, and launched after the iPhone set the standard for these concepts. It, IMO, got the overall OS concept down much better, appreciating that we need to run more than one app at a time, that when something wants our attention it shouldn't completely overtake the activity we're participating in, and allowing applications to tie their needs together in all kinds of clever and involved ways. But what it lacked was the long history of multimedia experience to inform that functionality, and that's where it still fails.

To be clear, Android's built-in media abilities are fine. They do the job well, their interface is decent, and I have little need to complain about it. Some phones, such as the Galaxy S line, include support for a lot more codecs making it actually EASIER to play videos on my phone than on an iPhone (my Epic 4G has so far played every single video format I've thrown on its card, without conversion) or Zune, and include improved media players. As well the Android Market is packed with alternatives for better podcasting software than Google's passable Listen app, better video players such as mVideoPlayer, better music apps such as DoubleTwist or WinAmp or a dozen others, streaming options like Slacker, etc. Point is, its flexibility allows it as a media device to functionally match or surpass the iPhone and Windows Phone 7 quite comfortably, even if not as fluidly or naturally. So it's not in its technical abilities that Android fails me. It's merely in one simple overlooked place: audio mixing.

Android seems, under most circumstances, unable to mix two disparate sources of audio into its output at the same time. When playing music, a video, streaming audio, playing a podcast, etc., any other audio playback that occurs (such as the variety of notifications your dozens of apps can use to get your attention, carefully customized to exactly your needs, or directions from your navigation software), the OS will simply kill whatever audio track was already playing for as long as it takes to play back the other audio (including any dead silence that was included in the clip before or after), and then continue playing the original line of audio. It doesn't pause the audio, it merely mutes it. When playing back music this is unbelievably annoying and distracting, and when playing back an audio book or podcast it's simply unforgiveable. The number of times I have to hit the skip back button in BeyondPod to see what I missed because an email came in while I was enjoying the latest Drabblecast is ridiculous, not to mention mildly unsafe. And even in music it leads me to avoid using Slacker or my other amazing music sources when I have guests in my car because it's simply embarrassing to have the audio constantly shut down while we're trying to enjoy ourselves. I find myself apologizing for it or simply shutting it off and switching to FM.

So far Google seems unconcerned with the issue despite the large number of complaints in their support sites about it. The problem's existed throughout every version, and it doesn't seem to be acknowledged. But it's enough to make me consider digging out my Zune again just for audio, except it still fails to provide me the streaming options I've grown to expect since switching to Android.

Another smaller failing in this area is Android's handling of Bluetooth when there's an audio cable plugged into the device. It seems to assume that if I have anything plugged into the headphone jack that I must prefer to use that as my hands-free solution instead of the paired and connected Bluetooth headset. This might make sense if I were using the included headphones with microphone built in, but it's a failed assumption when I'm in the car and have an audio cable plugged into my sound system. It's even more of a failure since it doesn't notice that my audio cable doesn't have a line for microphone, can't deliver audio to it, and doesn't leave the phone's built-in mic open. So when I'm driving and listening to music through my phone and I get a call, despite having my Bluetooth headset on and in my ear, I have to reach over and unplug the audio cable from my phone and then answer the call, otherwise I hear my caller through my car's speakers and they hear nothing in response. The iPhone, as far as I've witnessed, actually asks you which device you want to answer through when a phone call comes in, routing to your Bluetooth or other options accordingly. Presumably if you were to hit the answer button ON your Bluetooth it would be smart enough to route there. Android still doesn't do this.

These issues aren't enough to override everything that I love about Android, but they are enough to cause some audible profanities in my car for reasons I don't think are necessary. These SHOULD be easy to fix, as even Windows Mobile, for all its failings, worked fine in these circumstances. And yet, at least for now, they remain untouched. Google's lack of concern on these types of matters seems to border almost on Apple's methods of telling their users their desired features don't matter, except Google instead simply ignores the problem entirely. It's unfortunate, and I really hope it improves. While I'm sure there are other issues with Android that bug me, if these two problems were resolved I'd feel as close to 100% happy with it as I could in a technology world with a constantly moving target of expectations. Let's shore this up and move on.

Mr. Deity and the Matter

Just a quick post since I have trouble getting the time to write the long ones anymore. The newest episode of Mr. Deity is up, and it marks my season 4 premiere, finally. Check it out and post your feedback:

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SxpZDlvtOm8